Published on:

The law under O.C.G.A. §33-24-56.1 is very specific as to when your health insurance benefits provider can obtain reimbursement from your personal injury settlement due to the health benefits they provided you because of the injury. The law states that your health insurance benefits provider can only obtain reimbursement it has paid on account of the injury up to the amount allocated to those categories of damages in the settlement documents or judgment if they meet the following:

“1)The amount of the recovery exceeds the sum of all economic and noneconomic losses incurred as a result of the injury, exclusive of losses for which reimbursement may be sought under this Code section; and
2) The amount of the reimbursement claim is reduced by the pro rata amount of the attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation incurred by the injured party in bringing the claim.”

What does this mean for you? It means that only if an insurance company can prove that you have been fully compensated: “made whole” are they able to recover reimbursement. Here is an example to illustrate: let’s say you recovered $200,000 in a settlement for your personal injury claim, let’s also say the sum of all your economic and noneconomic losses totaled $300,000, and the insurance company paid $50000 in your medical bills for your injury which they are now seeking reimbursement. In this situation, the insurance company cannot go after your settlement money to get reimbursement because the sum of your recovery ($200,000) did not exceed your total economic and noneconomic losses, exclusive of losses for which reimbursement may be sought ($300,000-$50,000= $250,000).

However, if it did, we would then jump to the second prong of the statute which states that the amount of reimbursement still must be reduced “by the pro rata amount of the attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation incurred by the injured party in bringing the claim.”
Continue reading →

Published on:

You’ve been injured in a serious accident and receive a $100,000 settlement for your injuries. Your health insurance company covered most of your medical bills. The question: Can your health insurance company seek reimbursement for all the medical bills they paid to treat your injuries? An effective attorney can help you with these questions.

Georgia statute §33-24-56.1 is known as the “Reimbursement Statute” under Georgia law. This law prohibits the insurance company from being reimbursed “if” you have not been fully compensated for all economic and noneconomic losses. §O.C.G.A. §33-24-56.1(b). Determining “if” you have been fully compensated requires a complete understanding of Georgia law because the issue is often complex.

Another important consideration is that O.C.G.A. §33-24-56.1(c) prohibits your health insurance company from withholding or reducing your coverage as a setoff for reimbursement. The law also prohibits insurance companies from creating policies or contracts that conflict with the law. O.C.G.A. §33-24-56.1. The law also sets forth a procedure to be followed by the you, the injured party in providing notice of the personal injury claim to the benefit provider (O.C.G.A. §33-24-56.1).

The point is clear: understanding the law when reviewing your policy is vital to maximizing your negotiating position with stubborn insurance companies, to help protect the compensation you receive, for the injuries you suffered.
Continue reading →

Published on:

When it comes to Georgia contract law, poorly drafted non-compete employment agreements have caused severe financial loss and competitive advantage to many businesses. If your business wants to protect its clients, potential customers, and secured information from being used by employees once they leave, then consider the following:

The main reason why non-compete agreements fail in Georgia is because the drafter (attorney) of the agreement simply did not understand the nuances regarding case law in this area and the distinctions between a non-compete covenant, a non solicitation covenant and a non recruitment covenant. Each of those three covenants is given different treatment under Georgia law.

In Georgia, non-compete agreements (covenants) fall under strict scrutiny and that means: if even one clause of your employee’s non-compete agreement is held invalid, the whole agreement is invalid. When determining whether your non-compete agreement is valid, Courts look at the duration of the restriction; the conduct restricted; and the geographical scope of the restriction, amongst other criteria.

However, “non solicitation” agreements are analyzed differently. Because of a 1992 Georgia Supreme Court case, non solicitation agreements (covenants) do not have to specify geographical limits. That’s a vital distinction. But understand: non “solicitation” agreements nevertheless have restrictions and, again, if one of these restrictions is violated, you run a high risk of having your entire non solicitation agreement held unenforceable, invalid.
Continue reading →

Published on:

In these hard economic times, more and more consumers are cheated by businesses that falsely advertise their product and services, breach a contract, or make promises they don’t keep. If you have been a victim of unfair or illegal practices, the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act protects you. This Georgia law regulates unfair or deceptive practices in consumer transactions in Georgia which are defined as transactions for personal, family or household purposes. The Act allows private citizens in Georgia to sue for violations in certain circumstances. Prohibited activities under the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act include, but are not limited to the following:

• False or misleading statements about a business product or service • Representing used goods, including vehicles, as new when they are not.
• False claims referring to the particular quality of a product or particular kind of service
If your Georgia consumer rights have been violated, there are private remedies for individuals injured or damaged by an unfair or deceptive act or practice. These remedies may include:

• General damages as a consequence of the violation • Equitable injunctive relief • Reasonable attorney fees and litigation expense if the defendant does not make a reasonable offer of settlement within 30 days after receipt of a written demand for relief by certified mail.
Continue reading →

Published on:

images.jpgA tractor trailer truck weighing over 47,000 pounds struck Georgian Methodist minister Rev. Joseph Roberson’s automobile, tragically ending his life. The Reverend was driving in South Georgia when he drove past an unseeable stop sign on Poor Robin Road and crossed over a highway where he was struck and killed. Georgia State Patrol stated that the stop sign on the road had been lying on the ground. Roberson drove past the downed sign in his 2009 Honda Accord, crossing the northbound lanes of Highway 21 where a southbound tractor trailer struck his car on the passenger side causing fatal injuries.

When a city fails to properly maintain a stop sign in an upright visible condition, and a wrongful death or serious injury occurs, the city may be held liable for damages. Maximum recovery and justice many times depends on how quickly the victim or someone acting on behalf of the victim seeks professional help, because there are so many variables involved from preserving evidence to properly handling aggressive insurance agents of the trucking company. And even if you receive compensation for such a tragic accident, your lawyer must also know how to protect your recovery regarding your own health insurance companies and federal programs, if they apply to your situation.
Continue reading →

Contact Information